National President Dougan Pens Letter to House Committee Urging Opposition to Federal Retirement Cuts
Tuesday, February 7, 2012(National Federation of Federal Employees)
Tuesday afternoon, the House
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, a
committee that writes laws governing the
federal workforce, will consider a bill (H.R.
3813) with a serious impact on your retirement
security. In response to this attack of your
retirement benefits, NFFE National President
William R. Dougan wrote the following
letter:
Dear
Representative:
On behalf of the National
Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE) and the
110,000 federal employees our union represents
throughout the United States and abroad, I am
writing to urge you to oppose H.R. 3813 when it
comes to the House Oversight and Government
Reform Committee for a
vote.
H.R. 3813, a bill introduced
by Representative Dennis Ross (R-FL), would
require massive increases in contributions to
pensions for current and future federal
employees. At the same time, this bill
would drastically reduce retirement benefits
for current and future federal workers. This
bill would make federal employees pay
substantially more for a significantly smaller
retirement, an unconscionable change
considering the average annual pension benefit
for FERS retirees, is just $12,780 per year.
Despite the best efforts of
some to characterize this as a “bloated”
pension, the fact is federal retirees receive a
modest benefit for their service to the
American people, and gutting this critical
benefit will make it very difficult for federal
agencies to recruit and retain the talented and
skilled workforce necessary to carry out agency
missions.
Among the pension cuts
included in H.R. 3813
are:
1. A 1.5% contribution
increase by current federal workers under CSRS
and FERS;
2. The creation of a new,
third tier federal employee pension system
called Secure Annuity Employee (SAE), in which
new hires with less than five years of previous
federal experience would have to pay 4% of
their wages into the FERS pension fund (workers
currently pay 0.8%);
3. A change to the pension
multiplier for current federal workers from
1.1% to 1% if they retire after age 62,
resulting in a 9-10% benefit cut;
4. Calculating SAE
pensions by averaging a workers highest five
years of wage earnings, versus the current
high-three, resulting in an approximate benefit
cut of 5%; and,
5. Using the multiplier of
.7% to calculate SAE pensions, resulting in a
whopping 36% benefit cut compared to the
current 1.1% multiplier.
The cuts to federal employee
pensions included in H.R. 3813 are unwarranted
and unfair considering the significant
sacrifices that federal workers have already
made to ease the burden of our national
debt.
Federal workers accepted a two-year pay
freeze (for 2011 and 2012) which has been a
great burden to federal employees and their
families who are struggling just like everyone
else in this tough economy. This sacrifice
alone saved American taxpayers $60
billion.
Federal workers are also deeply impacted
by major cuts that have been made to the
federal budget – about $2 trillion over the
next decade. These cuts will undoubtedly lead
to downsizing at federal agencies, and will
likely lead to federal employee layoffs.
Targeting this group of middle class
Americans again – this time to strip federal
workers of their retirement security – should
be unthinkable to the members of this
Committee.
Again, NFFE strongly urges you
to oppose H.R. 3813.
For more information, please
contact NFFE Legislative Director Randy Erwin
(202-257-0948 or
rerwin@nffe.org).
Sincerely,
William
R. Dougan
National
President
