Home Contact UsConnect With Us facebook Twitter Feed for NFFE
   

Federal Pensions Reportedly in the Crosshairs as Debt Ceiling Negotiations Take Shape; Employee Contribution May Increase Seven-Fold

Monday, May 16, 2011

(National Federation of Federal Employees)

Details began to emerge this weekend from White House and congressional negotiators with regards to the shape of a long-term deficit reduction plan to coincide with the raising of the national debt ceiling. After weeks of negotiations, it appears that lawmakers will return to a familiar source to find the savings they are looking for: the federal workforce.

 

Administration officials have reportedly agreed to Republican demands for federal workers to contribute more to their pensions, though a definitive number has yet to be chosen. Republican negotiators are pressing for FERS employees to contribute a full six percent of their salary toward their pensions, or more than seven times the 0.8 percent they contribute today. Democrats will likely support a more modest figure, likely in the two to three percent range. Nonetheless, it appears that both parties have conceptually agreed to place the burden of debt reduction on the backs of hardworking federal employees once again.

 

“Instead of making any serious effort to address the deficit, Washington politicians have decided to take a second drink at the federal employees’ well,” said NFFE National President William R. Dougan. “Federal workers have already accepted a serious pay reduction, and now our elected officials are asking for five percent more. Where does it stop?”

 

If the full six percent pension contribution is enacted, federal workers would see their pay automatically reduced by five percent. Coming on the heels of a two-year pay freeze, this proposal would serve as a de facto extension of the wildly unpopular policy.

 

“I am sick and tired of politicians squeezing federal workers time and time again instead of spreading the burden around,” said NFFE Legislative Director Randy Erwin. “The special interests have been prioritized over dedicated public servants for too long, and it cannot continue.”

 

NFFE remains starkly opposed to any proposal that would reduce federal employees’ retirement security, a position that was reiterated in a letter written to members of the U.S. Senate early last week. NFFE will continue to oppose legislation that unfairly targets the retirement security that federal employees have earned through years of dedicated public service.

 

“Federal employees earn their retirement,” said Erwin.  “We‘ve got to do all we can to keep the politicians’ hands off of it.”

 

 

 

Comments

Janis   05/23/11 12:43 pm
Federal Workers Take on More than Share of the Sacrifice but Oil Company Execs Take None
It is just amazing to me that time and time again federal workers are asked to make sacrifices but multi-billion dollar oil companies and their executives continue to eat at the trough of public welfare. One of the oil execs in the recent hearings said he thinks the American Public wants "shared prosperity." I am wondering when that kicks in for the rest of us. They certainly seem to be having more than their share of proposerity.

Michael Gropman   05/16/11 9:14 pm
Leave FERS and CSRS as they are.

David V. Chevalier   05/16/11 11:52 am
A pay cut by any other name means FIGHT!
Some of us in the Federal Workforce are already contributing large amounts to our FERS retirement accounts. But to do so is optional for those who would like to see more in retirement checks... should they live so long to enjoy them. But to force the 6% solution on to people, many who are already strapped to make ends meet, just ends up, to all intents and purposes, a pay cut. Much as boxers who find opponents on the ropes an opportune time to beat them unmercifully, we are easily thrashed upon for more and more suffering making it is easier to defeat in total near the end of this round.

Aaahhh, but here�s the rub� should we be able to keep our feet, the next round, with the next Congress may turn the tables in this fight. Not that we shouldn�t keep up the good fight now, it�s just that those we oppose this round are ruthless thugs. Next round, next Congress we can and will make a come back.

Fight, fight, fight, always fight, and look for points and avenues of advantage. Who knows, they may go down faster than the Contract on America went under.

Add Comment

Your Name:

Email: (optional)

Comment Title (optional):

Comment Text:

Type the letters and numbers you see in the image.
click here if you can't read the image.

 

Powered by Orchid Suites
Orchid ver. 4.7.6.